The US version of the A13 gets a 90Hz display, but the resolution is only 720p. The only downside is that this is a bog-standard 60Hz affair, so you’ll have to look elsewhere for silky smooth scrolling. Maximum brightness is also pretty good, peaking at 483cd/m² in our tests, and the phone’s contrast is a respectable 1,082:1. With an sRGB colour gamut coverage of 99.1%, a total volume of 129.3% and an average Delta E (colour variance) of 2.09, the A13’s display isn’t too shabby, and I’ve seen worse on recent phones at this price – here’s looking at you, Nokia G21. It isn’t a scratch on Samsung’s AMOLED tech, but you’re getting a screen that looks rather good for the money. A simple IPS number, the A13’s 6.6in screen has a resolution of 2,408 x 1,080 and a pixel density of 400ppi. The Galaxy A13 is one of the few Samsung phones without an OLED display. Another bonus is the 3.5mm headphone jack at the bottom, which is usually something missing from modern flagships, and the phone charges via USB-C, although it doesn’t come with a charging brick in the box. The side-mounted fingerprint reader returns, and in testing it recognised my digits without any hiccups. The screen is protected by a layer of Gorilla Glass 5, but the Galaxy A13 lacks any official IP rating for protection against the elements. Measuring 165 x 76 x 8.8mm (WHD), the Galaxy A13 isn’t the most pocketable of handsets, although this is offset slightly by the phone’s plastic build, which has limited the overall weight to just 195g. The A13’s single 8MP selfie camera is located inside a small notchlette at the top of the screen, although it doesn’t really get in the way while you’re watching YouTube or scrolling social media feeds. The front of the phone is completely dominated by a large, 6.6in display, with a slightly thick chin bezel. Unfortunately, this new design has an added drawback in that it’s a bit of a fingerprint magnet – it’s almost impossible to keep things smudge-free.īest smartphone 2023: The finest Android and Apple phones you can buy today Once more, the back of the phone is an all-plastic affair (no surprises there), but sadly it lacks the more premium look and feel of the previous model, consisting of just a single colour without any distinctive textures. Whether or not you prefer a pared-down design is entirely subjective, but I can’t shake the feeling that Samsung could have done more here to make the Galaxy A13 stand out. Where the Galaxy A12 was an intriguing mix of faux flagship looks with a unique two-tone design, the A13 is nothing of the sort and its appearance is rather tame by comparison. Kicking things off, the Galaxy A13’s design is rather pedestrian by modern standards. Samsung Galaxy A13 review: Design and key features It’s a great example of how to make a phone on a budget, with top-notch cameras, superior performance and a colour-accurate 90Hz OLED display. If you’re prepared to pay an extra £21 ( £200), you’ll probably be better off picking up the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 instead. There’s also the Nokia G21, which isn’t quite as good but gets you a 90Hz IPS screen and a rather nice design for just £150. Perhaps the biggest competition at this price comes in the form of the Moto G31, which is an excellent £170 handset with an OLED display and phenomenal battery life.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |